Полное понимание информации в тексте: выбор одного правильного ответа из четырёх предложенных · 53 задания
- Задание №16№16Лёгкое
It is implied in the text that when things go wrong optimists... 1) avoid finding fault with themselves. 2) focus on short-term solutions. 3) analyze…
Чтение: полное понимание
- Задание №16№16Среднее
What is the danger of taking a gap year, according to the text? 1) Risk of losing important skills. 2) Having a career in the field you dislike. 3) Mi…
Чтение: полное понимание
- Задание №16№16Среднее
Which statement summarising the advice given in the text is FALSE? 1) Avoid jobs that take up most of your time. 2) Inform your boss of your timetable…
Чтение: полное понимание
- Задание №16№16Сложное
The author thinks that New Year decorations in Russia are … 1) suitable. 2) strange. 3) stylish. 4) cheap.
Чтение: полное понимание
- Задание №16№16Сложное
“It” in “… Russians make up for it by hosting …” (paragraph 7) refers to the … 1) variety of student clubs. 2) social networking. 3) student activitie…
Чтение: полное понимание
- Задание №16№16Лёгкое
The phrase take heed in “Therefore, take heed, colleges and universities” (Paragraph 6) is closest in meaning to … 1) pay attention. 2) stay back. 3)…
Чтение: полное понимание
- Задание №16№16Лёгкое
Hikers behaved strangely because they were … 1) attacked by insects. 2) performing a ritual. 3) impressed by the Highlands. 4) having an argument.
Чтение: полное понимание
- Задание №16№16Среднее
Which statement about skills acquired while playing video games is FALSE, according to the text? 1) They can be used in other situations. 2) They impr…
Чтение: полное понимание
- Задание №16№16Лёгкое
The word “ relish ” in paragraph 8 “… younger pupils relish the chance …” means... 1) enjoy. 2) ignore. 3) envy. 4) inspire.
Чтение: полное понимание
- Задание №16№16Среднее
How did Martin’s family react to the idea of his project? 1) They fully supported it. 2) They didn’t believe in its success. 3) They thought it would…
Чтение: полное понимание
- Задание №16№16Лёгкое
The pronoun “its” in “… its liquid properties ” (paragraph 6) refers to … 1) caffeine. 2) carbon dioxide. 3) coffee. 4) coffee bean.
Чтение: полное понимание
- Задание №16№16Сложное
It is implied that the new auditorium supports an education program in … 1) programming. 2) architecture. 3) arts. 4) technology.
Чтение: полное понимание
The author used the Greenpeace data to show that …
Прочитайте текст и выполните задания 12–18. В каждом задании обведите цифру 1, 2, 3 или 4, соответствующую выбранному Вами варианту ответа.
Change your food choice
While recycling and refillable water bottles were once the most popular fad among the environmentally conscious, there is now a more pressing matter for humans to turn their attention to in order to slow global climate change: the animal industry.
When you navigate to the university website on campus sustainability, you find a list of all of the ways the University is making an effort to “go green”.
A plan to increase levels of recycling on campus? Great! Printers that reduce paper waste? Fantastic! A garden to collect excess rainwater? Amazing! Let’s go one step farther.
If we’re not actively educating students about the immense ways our food choices influence the environment, then we’re not doing enough to really serve the causes we claim to support. It’s not only about giving students the option to eat less meat but telling them how these choices can influence the future of the environment and create sustainable change. The question of whether eating meat is bad for the environment is not a question anymore. And the issue isn’t that people are unwilling to try more plant-based foods or unaware of the perils the environment is currently in, but rather, it’s that people aren’t aware of the effects their demand for meat has on the earth.
Lean and Green, a student initiative that strives to promote sustainability on campus through environmentally friendly and healthy diet choices, conducted a study that showed students don’t fully understand the impact their eating habits have on the environment.
The livestock industry of chickens, cows and pigs produces more greenhouse gas emissions that all cars and trucks combined, according to Greenpeace. So as we eat more meat, the demand for meat likewise goes up and increases those gases. But when we eat more meat alternatives instead, like nuts or tofu, we can make a big difference. According to Walter, if a person went vegetarian for a year, they would produce three times less carbon than if they were to purchase a hybrid car.
And interestingly, more than 92 percent of responders said they would like to see more plant-based foods in the university dining halls. So it’s clear that students are willing to eat less meat and explore more veggie-friendly options. But what’s not clear for students is why these options are imperative for making choices that help our planet.
With the student population of about 34,000, the University has the capability to make significant changes for the future of the environment. Give the students want they want – which is more diverse plant-based options – but also tell them why they should want it. Informing students about why these options are environmentally favorable can only inspire students to choose them more often. Posters throughout the dining halls, informational email campaigns, programs in residence halls and even financial incentives can help inform students and shape their knowledge and decision-making.
In conjunction with offering more vegetarian options, letting non-vegetarian students know about the sustainable benefits that come from choosing these foods can encourage them to eat them more often.
The animal industry is only going to grow if people keep eating meat. If our university wants to have an impact and keep up its reputation as environmentally conscious, it should ensure its students know how they can do their part to help the earth.
Правильный ответ
1
Пояснение
Разбор.
Для ответа на вопрос необходимо найти в тексте упоминание организации Greenpeace и проанализировать контекст, в котором приводятся её данные. Это происходит в шестом абзаце.
Автор пишет: “The livestock industry of chickens, cows and pigs produces more greenhouse gas emissions that all cars and trucks combined, according to Greenpeace.” (Согласно данным Гринпис, животноводство — разведение кур, коров и свиней — производит больше выбросов парниковых газов, чем все легковые и грузовые автомобили вместе взятые). Сравнение с транспортом используется здесь как инструмент, чтобы подчеркнуть колоссальный масштаб ущерба, который наносит экологии мясная промышленность (the animal industry).
Рассмотрим, почему другие варианты не подходят:
- Вариант 2 (transport is the main source of greenhouse gases production) противоречит тексту. Автор, напротив, утверждает, что животноводство производит “more greenhouse gas emissions” (больше выбросов), чем транспорт.
- Вариант 3 (hybrid cars can reduce greenhouse gas emissions) упоминается позже в этом же абзаце со ссылкой на другого человека (“According to Walter”), а не на Гринпис, и служит лишь для сравнения эффективности вегетарианства и покупки машины.
- Вариант 4 (vegetarian food is much healthier for a person) не является целью приведения данных Гринпис. Хотя в тексте упоминаются “healthy diet choices”, статистика Гринпис сфокусирована исключительно на экологическом аспекте (выбросах газов), а не на влиянии диеты на здоровье человека.
Таким образом, данные Гринпис призваны подтвердить тезис о том, что животноводство наносит огромный вред окружающей среде.
Ответ: 1
Источник: ФИПИ