Полное понимание информации в тексте: выбор одного правильного ответа из четырёх предложенных · 53 задания
- Задание №13№13Среднее
Which is NOT discussed in the article as an outcome of an optimistic attitude? 1) Fighting a sad mood. 2) Lengthening a person’s life. 3) Overcoming e…
Чтение: полное понимание
- Задание №13№13Лёгкое
Deferring in Paragraph 2 most probably means … 1) rejecting. 2) delaying. 3) getting. 4) choosing.
Чтение: полное понимание
- Задание №13№13Лёгкое
These in Paragraph 3 (“These will be at least minimum wage …”) refers to … 1) jobs on campus. 2) university open days. 3) part-time jobs outside the u…
Чтение: полное понимание
- Задание №13№13Сложное
What does the author NOT advise foreigners to do? 1) Choose presents for hosts carefully. 2) Take an extra pair of home shoes. 3) Ask your hosts quest…
Чтение: полное понимание
- Задание №13№13Сложное
It is implied that your communication skills are … when you live abroad. 1) improved naturally 2) challenged 3) more effective 4) often ignored
Чтение: полное понимание
- Задание №13№13Сложное
Which of the following is NOT true about college eating, according to the author? 1) Food choices in college can determine your future nutrition. 2) M…
Чтение: полное понимание
- Задание №13№13Лёгкое
It in Paragraph 3 (and a lake running alongside it) refers to the … 1) lakeshore. 2) street. 3) shop. 4) church.
Чтение: полное понимание
- Задание №13№13Сложное
This in paragraph 2 (Partly this is to do with how video games have been marketed for the last 30 years) refers to the … 1) access to video games. 2)…
Чтение: полное понимание
- Задание №13№13Сложное
What does the OECD report suggest? 1) Students should not use computers in their studies. 2) The more the students use the computers the worse their r…
Чтение: полное понимание
- Задание №13№13Среднее
The phrase “It didn’t come easy to him” in Paragraph 2 refers to Martin’s … 1) career choice. 2) dedication to coffee. 3) management abilities. 4) res…
Чтение: полное понимание
- Задание №13№13Сложное
The author believes that caffeine in coffee … 1) is part of a healthy diet. 2) is quite low. 3) can’t be removed completely. 4) may determine its tast…
Чтение: полное понимание
- Задание №13№13Сложное
The pronoun They, as used throughout paragraph 3, refers to … 1) future graduates. 2) former students. 3) board members. 4) the author’s friends.
Чтение: полное понимание
What does the OECD report suggest?
Прочитайте текст и выполните задания 12–18. В каждом задании запишите в поле ответа цифру 1, 2, 3 или 4, соответствующую выбранному Вами варианту ответа.
Tablets out, imagination in
In the heart of Silicon Valley is a nine-classroom school where employees of tech giants Google, Apple and Yahoo send their children. But despite its location in America’s digital centre, there is not an iPad, smartphone or screen in sight. The fact that parents working for the biggest technology companies are questioning the value of computers in education begs the question – is the futuristic dream of high-tech classrooms really in the best interests of the next generation?
A global report by the OECD organisation suggests that there is no link between excessive use of computers and high results for reading, maths and science. What is more, those students who use tablets and computers often tend to do worse than students who use them less frequently.
Beverly Amico from the Association of Waldorf Schools of North America explains that their teachers encourage students to learn subjects by expressing themselves through artistic activities such as painting and drawing, rather than consuming information downloaded onto a tablet. The idea is to get rid of the distraction of electronic media and to encourage stronger communication between teacher and pupil during lessons.
Amico claims one of the reasons parents who work in the digital industry are choosing a low-tech, no-tech education for their children is that it teaches students innovative thinking skills. And these are what many employers desire. She adds that students weaned on technology often lack the ability to think outside the box and solve problems.
Sarah Thorne, head of the London Acorn school, also questions the belief that limiting or removing the use of technology in class will make the students less competitive on the job market.
Students under the age of 12 at the school in Morden, London, are banned from using smartphones and computers, and watching TV or films at all times, including during holidays. The school’s students are allowed to watch TV once they reach 12 years old and then only documentaries that have been previously vetted by parents. They cannot watch films until they are 14. The Internet is banned completely for everyone under 16, both at home and at school. And computers are only to be used as part of the school curriculum for students who are at least 14.
It may sound draconian, but Thorne believes taking a more considered approach to the use of technology in class allows teachers to help students develop core skills such as leadership, decision making and creativity. Besides, much of the technology which is cutting edge today is likely to appear primitive in tomorrow’s world.
Thorne claims feedback from students about the restrictions has been positive. Younger pupils relish the chance to play and even teenagers who have come from a typical school admit they are happier.
Restricting the use of technology is also a challenge for the 21st century teachers, who are used to the easy accessibility of resources and information, thanks to interactive whiteboards and computers. “It is hard work,” admits Ian Young, a class teacher. “You definitely have to be a lot more creative in how you deliver a lesson,” he says. “You have to work with your voice more, whether it is loud or quiet, to give them incentive. You need to make sure you keep them interested in what’s coming next.” He adds: “I don’t think we are doing children any favours by teaching them through machines at that young age.”
Правильный ответ
2
Пояснение
Разбор. Ответ на вопрос о результатах отчета OECD (Организация экономического сотрудничества и развития) находится во втором абзаце текста.
Автор статьи ссылается на данные исследования: «What is more, those students who use tablets and computers often tend to do worse than students who use them less frequently» (Более того, те ученики, которые часто пользуются планшетами и компьютерами, как правило, учатся хуже, чем те, кто пользуется ими реже). Эта фраза прямо подтверждает вариант номер 2, указывая на обратную зависимость между частотой использования гаджетов и успеваемостью.
Разберем, почему остальные варианты не подходят:
- Вариант 1 (Students should not use computers in their studies) не подходит, так как в отчете констатируются факты и взаимосвязи, а не дается прямой запрет или категоричная рекомендация полностью отказаться от техники.
- Вариант 3 (Superabundant use of computers doesn’t influence students’ achievements) противоречит тексту. В первом предложении абзаца говорится, что нет связи между избыточным использованием и высокими результатами («no link between excessive use of computers and high results»), но следующее же предложение уточняет, что частое использование ведет к худшим результатам («tend to do worse»), то есть влияние на достижения все же есть, и оно отрицательное.
- Вариант 4 (Results in Reading, Maths and Science benefit from use of computers) полностью ложен согласно тексту, так как отчет утверждает обратное: «no link between excessive use of computers and high results for reading, maths and science».
Ответ: 2
Источник: ФИПИ