Полное понимание информации в тексте: выбор одного правильного ответа из четырёх предложенных · 52 задания
- Задание №18№18Лёгкое
At the end of the article the author tries to... 1) suggest ways to become more positive. 2) share her experience of optimistic practices. 3) encourag…
Чтение: полное понимание
- Задание №18№18Среднее
The author of the article aims to … 1) advise on how to balance work and study. 2) highlight the disadvantages of part-time work. 3) explain how to fi…
Чтение: полное понимание
- Задание №18№18Лёгкое
What is the author’s overall impression of Russia on New Year’s eve? 1) It is very noisy. 2) It is definitely worth visiting. 3) It is too cold in win…
Чтение: полное понимание
- Задание №18№18Сложное
What are people sure to experience when coming to stay in a different country, according to the author? 1) Both good and bad emotions. 2) Language bar…
Чтение: полное понимание
- Задание №18№18Среднее
The main goal of the article is to … 1) discuss the reasons for obesity and chronic diseases. 2) call the readers’ attention to the importance of coll…
Чтение: полное понимание
- Задание №18№18Лёгкое
How can the author’s weekend experience be described? 1) Thought-provoking. 2) Eye - opening. 3) Time-consuming. 4) Pressure-free.
Чтение: полное понимание
- Задание №18№18Лёгкое
What is the authors’ overall attitude to video games? 1) Cautious. 2) Intrigued. 3) Enthusiastic. 4) Astonished.
Чтение: полное понимание
- Задание №18№18Лёгкое
Ian Young believes that the 21st century demands that a teacher becomes more … 1) creative. 2) hardworking. 3) entertaining. 4) informative.
Чтение: полное понимание
- Задание №18№18Сложное
We may conclude from the last paragraph that Martin’s store … 1) is what Martin’s project was all about. 2) serves coffee that is very different from…
Чтение: полное понимание
- Задание №18№18Среднее
Even though decaffeinated coffee has been improved, the author … 1) is for the ban of decaffeination. 2) believes that it’s bad for health. 3) still p…
Чтение: полное понимание
- Задание №18№18Сложное
The major aim of the article is to … 1) show the author’s experience of philanthropy. 2) criticize how the donors’ money is spent. 3) explain what phi…
Чтение: полное понимание
- Задание №18№18Среднее
What is the author’s overall attitude to attendance requirements? 1) Absence should be approved by university or by responsible adults. 2) It is up to…
Чтение: полное понимание
Ian Young believes that the 21st century demands that a teacher becomes more …
Прочитайте текст и выполните задания 12–18. В каждом задании запишите в поле ответа цифру 1, 2, 3 или 4, соответствующую выбранному Вами варианту ответа.
Tablets out, imagination in
In the heart of Silicon Valley is a nine-classroom school where employees of tech giants Google, Apple and Yahoo send their children. But despite its location in America’s digital centre, there is not an iPad, smartphone or screen in sight. The fact that parents working for the biggest technology companies are questioning the value of computers in education begs the question – is the futuristic dream of high-tech classrooms really in the best interests of the next generation?
A global report by the OECD organisation suggests that there is no link between excessive use of computers and high results for reading, maths and science. What is more, those students who use tablets and computers often tend to do worse than students who use them less frequently.
Beverly Amico from the Association of Waldorf Schools of North America explains that their teachers encourage students to learn subjects by expressing themselves through artistic activities such as painting and drawing, rather than consuming information downloaded onto a tablet. The idea is to get rid of the distraction of electronic media and to encourage stronger communication between teacher and pupil during lessons.
Amico claims one of the reasons parents who work in the digital industry are choosing a low-tech, no-tech education for their children is that it teaches students innovative thinking skills. And these are what many employers desire. She adds that students weaned on technology often lack the ability to think outside the box and solve problems.
Sarah Thorne, head of the London Acorn school, also questions the belief that limiting or removing the use of technology in class will make the students less competitive on the job market.
Students under the age of 12 at the school in Morden, London, are banned from using smartphones and computers, and watching TV or films at all times, including during holidays. The school’s students are allowed to watch TV once they reach 12 years old and then only documentaries that have been previously vetted by parents. They cannot watch films until they are 14. The Internet is banned completely for everyone under 16, both at home and at school. And computers are only to be used as part of the school curriculum for students who are at least 14.
It may sound draconian, but Thorne believes taking a more considered approach to the use of technology in class allows teachers to help students develop core skills such as leadership, decision making and creativity. Besides, much of the technology which is cutting edge today is likely to appear primitive in tomorrow’s world.
Thorne claims feedback from students about the restrictions has been positive. Younger pupils relish the chance to play and even teenagers who have come from a typical school admit they are happier.
Restricting the use of technology is also a challenge for the 21st century teachers, who are used to the easy accessibility of resources and information, thanks to interactive whiteboards and computers. “It is hard work,” admits Ian Young, a class teacher. “You definitely have to be a lot more creative in how you deliver a lesson,” he says. “You have to work with your voice more, whether it is loud or quiet, to give them incentive. You need to make sure you keep them interested in what’s coming next.” He adds: “I don’t think we are doing children any favours by teaching them through machines at that young age.”
Правильный ответ
1
Пояснение
Разбор.
Для ответа на вопрос о том, каким, по мнению Иана Янга, должен стать учитель в 21 веке, необходимо обратиться к последнему абзацу текста, где приводятся слова этого преподавателя.
В девятом абзаце Иан Янг прямо говорит о требованиях к современному педагогу в условиях ограничения технологий: “You definitely have to be a lot more creative in how you deliver a lesson” (Вы определенно должны быть гораздо более творческими в том, как вы преподаете урок). Это утверждение полностью соответствует варианту 1.
Рассмотрим остальные варианты, чтобы убедиться в их неверности:
- Вариант 2 (hardworking) не подходит, так как, хотя учитель и признает, что такая работа — это “hard work” (тяжелый труд), он делает акцент именно на развитии творческого подхода (креативности) как необходимом качестве, а не просто на трудолюбии.
- Вариант 3 (entertaining) не является верным, так как текст упоминает необходимость “keep them interested” (поддерживать их интерес), но не говорит о том, что учитель должен стать «развлекающим» (entertaining). Речь идет о методике подачи материала голосом и вовлечении, что является частью педагогического мастерства, а не индустрии развлечений.
- Вариант 4 (informative) противоречит контексту абзаца. Напротив, автор говорит, что учителя привыкли к “easy accessibility of resources and information” (легкой доступности ресурсов и информации) благодаря компьютерам, но теперь им нужно менять подход к подаче материала, а не просто быть источником информации.
Таким образом, ключевым качеством, которое требует 21 век от учителя в данной школе, является креативность.
Ответ: 1
Источник: ФИПИ